Bruce Springsteen the Ghost of Tom Joad Album Cover Art
The encompass of Wrecking Brawl. hide caption
toggle caption
On Mon morning, national treasure Bruce Springsteen appear that he'll release a new studio album two weeks into the new yr. For dedicated fans like me, the annunciation was full of curious details to choice over and talk over: Three songs, including the the title track, "High Hopes," were not written by Springsteen. Tom Morello, who's been playing with him on tour and whom The Boss calls "my muse" in the announcement, plays guitar on eight. Longtime Eastward Street ring members Danny Federici and Clarence "Big Man" Clemons are on the record, too, though they died in 2008 and 2011, respectively.
Information technology's quite typical of Springsteen to record material and then shelve information technology for years. Two of the songs on Loftier Hopes came out in different versions already, in 1995. One of those was but on a CD single you lot got every bit an actress if you bought a Springsteen video on VHS. (I did, yes. No, I don't, still. Close upwardly.) Nineteen-ninety-v. VHS, you lot guys.
But it one key respect, the new album is business organization as usual for The Boss: Its cover is an eyesore.
A photocopier blow.
A cancer upon sight.
The opinion: wide. The collar: popped. The sepia: toned. The guitar: Trying to leap out of his hands, maybe?
Bruce-left may await confident and adamant, but Bruce-right looks alarmed. Moreover, he appears to be looking to Bruce-left the fashion many of the states accept long looked to Bruce-Prime: For alleviation and reassurance. For strength.
Okay, so information technology's not wretched. Just it'due south certainly in a land far from "good."
Nosotros're used to this. Bruuuuuuuuuce's prior anthology, 2012's Wrecking Ball, had a cover that looked like a kid had finger-painted its title over a goofy photo of Springsteen with Wite-Out...
...which was in fact a vast improvement upon the cover of 2009'southward Working on a Dream, which, as I wrote at the fourth dimension (I've been thinking about this since former after the VHS tape), arrived "wrapped in a velvet-Elvis style tableau that looks like something a member of the Backstreets staff paid an art teacher at Freehold Customs College to paint on the side of his van."
Why must this be? Why? Springsteen somehow retains his nobility even when smashing his crotch into a photographic camera lens during the Super Bowl halftime show. In that location are decades of interviews attesting to his admirable gustation in writers and filmmakers and then on. He's always been a perfectionist in the studio and in the mastering suite. Where does that fussiness go when he chooses the packaging for the music that means so much to him? Does he know what albums wait like?
I get that anthology covers don't matter anymore. We barely even find them in our picayune iTunes windows. The only cover I tin even picture show from a record I bought this year is the Yes Yeah Yeahs' Mosquito, and I only retrieve that one because it depicts a Starship Troopers-scale winged insect violating a baby. (Google information technology yourself, sicko. I wish I could unsee it.)
But Springsteen'southward beginning anthology came out in 1973. (And it had 1 of his amend covers!) For nearly of his iv-decade-plus career, people bought records in physical formats, and presumably caught at least a glimpse of the sleeve when they took them out to play them.
Bruce, I speak with the honey and entitlement of a faithful fan when I tell you that your 21st century albums would look better if they'd arrived the way you spent much of the mid-80s: sleeveless. Seriously. Rent someone. Or fire someone. I don't know.
Tin it be a coincidence that the two albums nearly responsible for elevating Springsteen from promising folk-rock savant to globally adored superstar are the ones with the best sleeves? I mean "best" in the sense of most appropriate to the themes and tone of the album, simply also in the sense of least fugly.
Born to Run famously features Springsteen and Clemons in a pose of defiant esprit. (It also features the Big Homo in leather pants.)
This was the record where the Due east Street Band lineup of legend came together, and it contains their "creation myth" vocal, "10th Artery Freeze-Out." This prototype conveys all that, I call back. Smashing encompass. Great album.
If you lot tin can guess a cover by its parodies, then Born to Run's is among the greatest.
(Eric Meola, the photographer who shot the Born to Run cover, blogged about his recollections of the 1975 session before long after Clemons died in 2011. His post, which fans will observe of interest, is here.)
Nine years later, Built-in in the U.S.A. gave u.s. an Annie Leibovitz photo of the denim-shrouded Boss-terior. This was his biggest-selling album past far, and another solid marriage of form and content.
These are the only two Springsteen album covers I'd call iconic. There are others that, while not aesthetically remarkable, still offer a good representation of the music within. On 1978'south Darkness on the Border of Town, iii years afterwards Built-in to Run, his cocky smirk on the cover of the latter is gone, replaced by a haunted look. The music grew up on that record, too. There was, for the kickoff time, an acquittance that well-nigh people don't escape their grim economic or spiritual confines.
Nebraska and The Ghost of Tom Joad, released xiii years apart, were even more than somber, and their covers reflected the spare, troubled sings they carried. Most of Springsteen's albums have a picture of his face on the front, simply neither of these do. They're better for it, I think.
Springsteen, of course, embodies an erstwhile notion of populism like no other stadium-level creative person in his genre. (In terms of the way he presents himself to his public, he'due south more than akin to a country star.) "No drug busts, no blood changes in Switzerland, and no golfing!" as Bono observed, when he inducted Springsteen into the Stone and Holl Hall of Fame in 1998. "No embarrassing movie roles! No exhibitions of his ain paintings!"
An exhibition of his paintings, or a flake part in a John Sayles motion picture, would be less embarrassing than that Working on a Dream cover. But Bono is onto something there: Springsteen'south defining traits as an creative person have always been his empathy and his workaholism.
His 21st century covers, especially, have tried way also hard to underline this notion with their rust-colored filters and artfully fuzzed-over images of the Boss's face up. Only why do we need his face on every album? Unless the photo is going to point that we're going to get a side of him we haven't seen earlier, like Leibovitz's comprehend for the keen Tunnel of Love album did, why bother? Why non an image thematically related to the music instead of nonetheless some other coppery, Instagramy picture show of the age-defying international goodwill ambassador Bruce "The Boss" Springsteen?
I'thou still going to buy High Hopes. Of course I am; I behave the burden of fandom.
I'm looking forward to hearing information technology.
Not to seeing it, and then much.
doughertyquart1992.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.npr.org/2013/11/27/247492164/why-are-bruce-springsteens-album-covers-so-ugly